Sponsored by White & Case

Sponsored by Cravath

Enforcement agencies representatives will discuss their 2026/2027 priorities, how this may impact investigations and how they will work together.

• How do investigations now get triggered, framed, and prioritised when geopolitical tensions and national enforcement agendas diverge?
• What does the expanding scope of US enforcement mean in practice for cloud providers, AI developers, and other high‑growth tech sectors?
• How are different governments and enforcement authorities responding to a change in US policy and enforcement priorities?

• Why are enforcers becoming more selective about when they impose monitorships? 

• How are expectations of monitors changing? Are they worth what they were?  

• How should organisations prepare for monitorships today? 

• What could future monitorships look like? 

• What are the main enforcement priorities within APAC countries and why? 

• What is driving the rise in fraud and personal misconduct in India and, how does bribery risk compare with 10 years ago? 

• How are APAC regulators approaching cyber security and data protection and coordinating on cross-border incidents? 

• How are US/UK/EU sanctions and export controls reshaping ASEAN corporate risk, including prosecutions of foreign firms? 

• Are agencies in APAC countries cooperating in investigations and enforcement and how does that affect the risk calculation?  

A series of informal, small-group interactive discussions where participants exchange ideas, best practice, and experience. 

Led by breakout discussion facilitators 

• Are businesses preparing for US congressional investigations/change in US political direction? 

• How are sanctions, export controls and screening regimes being used to drive enforcement outcomes elsewhere? 

• Managing risk arising from distributors, foundries, cloud infrastructure providers, and research partners, including access to sensitive IP and confidential data 

• Compliance and internal controls – how should companies prepare for chip‑related investigations? 

• Differing perspectives of the same facts from regulators, lawyers, and accountants, and internal decision makers  

• Managing conflicting legal frameworks and parallel investigations 

• Regulatory strategy in a multipolar enforcement landscape  

• Financial & disclosure implications – translation into accounting consequences and public disclosure 

• How are in-house teams using AI? Will it replace external counsel? 

• Where does AI work well and where does it present risks? 

• Can AI realistically help firms investigate faster without increasing legal exposure? 

• Who owns AI governance? 

• Privilege risks when AI is involved  

• Regulator and auditor comfort with AI driven findings 

• Civil society as an enforcement driver and follow on actions from civil society groups 

• Activism and investigations – how is the market becoming the investigator? 

• What are civil society groups looking for when deciding who to investigate? 

• Managing risk of misconduct that civil society are driving enforcement for: modern slavery, trafficking, climate